void get_some_strings(vectorEasy! How do we do this if our API has to be pure C? Well, there are three options.& out_strings)
{
out_strings.clear();
for (some loop)
out_strings.push_back(whatever);
}
First you could always allow the function to allocate memory that's deallocated by the caller. I don't like this option at all. To me, it's a walking memory-leak waiting to happen. You'll have to check for memory leaks every time you use the function and there are no compile-time mechanisms to encourage good programming technique.
A second option is to pass in some preallocated buffers. Hrm - I think I tried that once. Unfortunately as you can read here, the technique is very error prone and it took Sandy (the better half of the SDK) to clean up the mess I made.
The third option, and least evil IMO is to use a callback. Now we have something like this:
void get_some_strings(void (* cb)(const char * str, void * ref), void * ref)If you can tollerate the C function callbacks (have a few Martinis - they'll look less strange) this actually provides a very simple implementation, which means less risk of memory-management bugs.
{
for (some stuff)
cb(some string, ref);
}
On the client side if you're using this library from C++ you can even turn this back into the vector code you wanted originally like this:
void vector_cb(const char * str, void * ref)Now I can use this one callback everywhere like this:
{
vector* v = (vector *)ref;
v->push_back(str);
}
vectorWhat I like about the callback solution is that both the client code and implementation code can be written in a simple and consise manner, which translates into solid code.my_results;
get_some_stuff(vector_cb,&my_results);
No comments:
Post a Comment